Top
首页 > 新闻 > 正文

心理追凶

Why Finland & Sweden's NATO Future is Uncertain, Fraught With Economic & Security Risks_我的网站

我和僵尸有个约会

A |     

原标题:能源危机!巴黎市长:埃菲尔铁塔灯光将提前熄灭……每经编辑:李泽东据央视新闻,当地时间9月13日,法国巴黎市长伊达尔戈宣布,为应对能源危机,巴黎市将采取一系列节能措施以减少能源消耗。    "The accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO constitutes a test of loyalty to the western bloc, in particular to the US and Great Britain, which are the real geopolitical and geostrategic beneficiaries of the ongoing conflict," said Dr. Tiberio Graziani, chairman of Vision & Global Trends International Institute for Global Analyses.,The two Nordic countries' neutrality differs. Sweden had not joined a military alliance or participated in any war since 1814, with its neutrality being flexible, self-declared and not enshrined in law, as the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars noted in its 2 February 2022 study.,In contrast, Finland's neutrality was stipulated by the Paris Peace Treaty of 1947 which was signed after the end of the Second World War between the Allied powers - including the USSR, the UK, the US and France - and former Nazi Germany allies, such as Italy, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria and Finland.,"This definitely appears to be a violation of Finland’s international agreements signed after WWII with the Soviet Union then later Russia," said Earl Rasmussen, executive vice-president of Eurasia Group, citing the 1947 treaty as well as the 1992 Russo-Finnish treaty.,It raises questions as to whether benefits from the abandoned neutrality will outweigh potential security risks for the two Nordic states.,"I am puzzled by how this inclusion will provide increased security, it appears it will likely further deteriorate relations between Russia and the EU and more specifically with Finland and Sweden," Rasmussen said. "Strategically, I am not sure what the real impact will be. Essentially, both Finland and Sweden are de facto NATO members to include coordination and joint exercises. However, tensions will likely increase and increased defensive measures will likely occur in Russia’s northern regions as well as Kaliningrad.",Why Finland & Sweden’s NATO Admission Is So Important to the US16 May, 19:17 GMT,What Do Finns and Swedes Think About NATO Membership?,Meanwhile, popular support for NATO membership in both Nordic states has never been high.,According to a 2021 poll commissioned by EVA Finnish Business and Policy Forum, around 26% of Finns were in favor of joining NATO, 40% against and 33% remained undecided. A January 2022 Demoskop survey showed 42% of Swedes supporting NATO accession and 37% of respondents opposed it.,The Russian special operation in Ukraine is said to have invigorated NATO proponents in both Nordic countries. Rasmussen noted that recent surveys in Finland have shown a spike in support up to 76%. However, in Sweden, support to join NATO has remained relatively low, climbing to just 47%, according to him.,Meanwhile, unlike Sweden, Finland shares a 1,340 km (830 mi) border with Russia and has maintained longstanding economic relations with Moscow for decades. As of 2019, Finland imported around 60% of its energy from Russia with the latter being the fourth largest importer of Finnish goods in 2017, according to the Wilson Center. Furthermore, Russian speakers constitute the third largest ethnic group in the Nordic country.,Putin: If NATO Infrastructure is Deployed to Finland & Sweden, Russia Will Respond in ‘Mirror Way’01:02 GMT,"Even during the Cold War, both states were neutral and non-NATO members, with Finland developing strong economic and trade relations with Russia," the Eurasia Group vice-president explained. "As trade degrades and energy sharing diminishes there will likely be a strain placed on the economies, mostly with Finland.",Moscow has repeatedly underscored that Russia harbors no hostile intentions against either Nordic country, yet also signaling that the latest NATO expansion will not make the continent more stable or secure. Earlier this week, Russian President Vladimir Putin emphasized that the Kremlin has "nothing that could worry us in terms of Finland or Sweden's membership in NATO," adding, however, that if military equipment or troops are deployed along the border, Moscow will have to "respond in a mirror manner and create the same threats in the territories from which they threaten us.",There is yet another controversy surrounding Sweden and Finland's accession to the western military bloc: neither Nordic state has held a popular referendum to find out whether the public has really weighed all the pros and cons of NATO membership.,"Political leadership in both countries is taking a certain degree of risk to push forward the joining without a public referendum," Rasmussen said. "I am sure Washington and Brussels realize that risk.",In addition to that, NATO accession may increase political polarization in both Nordic states, according to the Eurasia Group vice-president. In particular, "the Finnish government is made up of several political parties with no single party having a clear majority, hence requiring partnerships being established," he noted, adding that worsening economic conditions could "potentially create divisions politically and thus alignments could easily change.",Meanwhile, the Swedish left has lashed out at the government and the Social Democrats over Stockholm's NATO admission deal with Ankara. According to Expressen, the Greens and the Left Party are mooting a no-confidence vote against Foreign Minister Ann Linde.,Bank of England Head: UK To Face More Inflation Than Other Major Economies10:47 GMT,Why NATO's 2% Requirement Appears Unrealistic Today,NATO rules may trigger further controversy as they will require Sweden and Finland to spend 2% of gross domestic product (GDP) on their defense budgets. Even though the Nordic countries have committed to reaching the benchmark by 2024, the long-term viability of their promises is in question, given skyrocketing inflation in Europe.,Inflation in Finland has recently risen to its highest level in over 30 years, hitting 7.1% in May. In April, the country's consumer price index (CPI), a popular gauge for inflation, stood at 5.7%, according to Statistics Finland.,Likewise, annual inflation in Sweden jumped from 6.4% in April to 7.3% in May, according to the country's Consumer Price Index with fixed interest rate (CPIF).,"To this end, just as the Ukrainian people are sacrificed, so the economies of European countries will be sacrificed, including Finland and Sweden," forecast Graziani. "Very difficult economic and social months await us in Europe. It will be a very hot autumn. Political crises in various countries of the European Union are likely to be hypothesized.",EU member states, the UK and the US are taking efforts to tame galloping inflation which throws their capability of adhering to NATO requirements into question. To complicate matters further, the UK is calling to step up funding and arming of Ukraine "until victory" amid the Russian special operation.,"The US and UK are using the conflict in Ukraine to pressure greater EU involvement and support to include NATO contributions," said Rasmussen. "While it is being projected that member states will meet their 2% objectives by 2024, based on developing economic conditions and a pending recession, I question the realism of that projection. Increasing real contributions for defense along with rising tensions between the EU and Russia may prove challenging as economic conditions worsen resulting in political disruptions across Europe.",Meanwhile, the US is not in its best shape either, according to Rasmussen. The country steadily moves forward into a potentially deep recession; increased tensions with China; emerging challenges in Latin America; tensions with Iran; and economic challenges at home. The scholar believes that it is likely one will see a major political change in the US in 2022 midterms, in 2024 and beyond.,What’s more, as the Republican Party becomes increasingly influenced by MAGA supporters, Trump's skepticism towards the NATO alliance may get a second wind in 2024. And this raises further questions about the future of the Cold War-era military bloc.。自9月23日起,巴黎市政厅、市属博物馆以及巴黎各区政府建筑在夜晚22时停止照明,巴黎著名地标埃菲尔铁塔的灯光届时将提前于23时45分熄灭。另外,除托儿所和养老院外,公共场所取暖温度下调1摄氏度;公共游泳池温度将从27摄氏度下调至26摄氏度。图片来源:视觉中国 VCG111298794717据央视新闻报道,自俄乌冲突以来,全球油气价格猛涨。

B | 对于俄罗斯油气资源有很大依赖的欧洲区域受冲击尤其严重。有媒体表示,根据欧洲天然气储备组织(GIE AGSI+)的统计,目前法国的天然气储备达到91.89%。但是法国的总储备量只占到其总消费量的25.86%。而在电力方面,目前法国和德国2023年初每兆瓦时电力的大宗采购价已经分别突破了1000欧元和850欧元。法国今冬能源能否得到保障,目前还存在很多变数。当地时间9月2日,法国总统马克龙在爱丽舍宫召开了能源问题国防会议。会议结束后,法国能源转型部长阿涅丝·帕尼耶-吕纳谢举行了新闻发布会。图片来源:新华社吕纳谢向媒体表示,法国政府已在几个月前开始处理能源危机问题,目前俄罗斯对法国天然气的输送还没有完全切断,但是已经到了最低水平。法国的天然气储备已经达到92%。而在电力方面,法国电力公司目前56个核反应堆中32台由于各种原因处于停机当中,法国政府将推动法国电力公司在今冬将32台核反应堆全部启动发电,以缓解电力价格高企的局面。在欧洲范围内,法国承诺加强能源配置,提升与西班牙以及德国的电力和天然气交换。同时,她还呼吁法国企业和民众节约能源。她说,现在需要企业和民众将政府公布的节约措施落实到位,以避免更多的限制措施。法国政府的总体目标是将能源消耗减少10%。

C | 当地时间8月29日,法国总理伊丽莎白·博尔内警告“法国企业运动组织”的企业主代表,不排除今年冬季实施能源定量配给的可能性。她敦促企业采取措施减少能源消耗。另据央视新闻,当地时间9月2日,法国经济和金融部表示,一年以来,法国政府为应对能源危机带来的油气和电力价格上涨,采取了限价和补贴措施,已花费约240亿欧元的财政预算,约合法国国民生产总值的1%。

D | 预计这个数字还将继续上升。

E | 每日经济新闻综合央视新闻每日经济新闻返回搜狐,查看更多责任编辑:

Current article:http://31o6thr.ruandaimingyunsun.sbs/7z0v4rg/qv2.html

Published on:03:13:36


上一篇:足球报:玉昆三连客获得2分,俱乐部开通昆明玉溪往返球迷专线

下一篇:拉莫斯J罗相遇墨超!西甲官媒:每一个拥抱重逢背后都有一段故事